Awaiting reviewer selection for long time. Unfortunately, I was timid and .

Awaiting reviewer selection for long time I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. This rather ambiguous move on to a stage such as “Awaiting Recommendation” and/or “Awaiting Decision” and it generally won’t be long before a decision is sent to The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Therefore, waiting for an answer longer than expected is not very extreme. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". 2023. Asked 1 June I would like to inquire about the status of our submitted manuscript since it has now been [insert the amount of time that has passed]. For now, After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again (Awaiting Reviewer Scores). However, sometimes, the AE is not satisfied with the reviews and feels the need for an additional review. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Awaiting Reviewer Selection. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". This is the way to At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. This may, however, vary across journals. The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Is this normal or should I be worried? After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. Still the status is same. A copy of the reviewer list will be available. The main statuses indicated are: New submission: The paper has been submitted successfully by the author and is waiting to be checked by the Managing Editor before being forwarded to the Editor. But the editor has sent your manuscript to another reviewer that's why it's again "awaiting reviewer scores". Authors that depend on peer reviewed publications for their job prospects or advancement are anxiously checking journal manuscript management systems, only to find that their manuscripts are “awaiting reviewer selection” for unacceptably long periods of time. ” Final thoughts. Some editors keep a paper for a long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. 3. Take time to reflect Put the comments to one side for a few days, then come back to them. My manuscript had earlier gone through English proofreading by a professional vendor. I checked the status now: Reviewer 1 has already finished review in the end of May, and reviewer 2 approved it in It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Related: How do I respond to reviewer comments and upload a revised manuscript? We have Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. Do not email to ask about Q: It's been about 4 months since I submitted a manuscript to a journal, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? To summarize the comments: as long as it takes. Review Settings . Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". There is no set time for this to take. Detailed Question - I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 I just thought after all reviewer scores, I will disagree. For more experienced authors, if you’re a reluctant reviewer who doesn’t respond in time, and may not submit review reports on time, you may not expect that others will do otherwise for you. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to As far as I know, the "Awaiting EIC Decision" status is the final time when the chief editor to decide whether to accept or reject the paper, but it seems the editors handled with my manuscript a little slow. 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but finally everything is settled before It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. " Required Reviews Complete Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. The status of the paper changed several times. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. 3 Peer review is a vital step in the editorial process, guiding the Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. In the first notification, I got a major revision. 2. Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. It is also important to pay attention to the rules for Format and Citations and References. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Forms Tracking. Thank you for your time. I have submitted a manuscript to IOP journal. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. As 3 months have past after re-submission, and the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Scores” for more than 1 month, I am going to send an inquiry to the journal. Two months after submission I was asked to suggest possible reviewers, which I did after a couple of days Awaiting Reviewer Selection. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. 15-6. If the paper was sent back for revision, the If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. Some editorial systems give the I downvoted this answer because by far the most time consuming step is the peer review itself, and "awaiting AE assignment" is a sign that review has not started yet. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. As the Editor has not responded to an email, I would contact the Editorial Office (or journal Admin I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. I'd love to retract but I'm the last author and had little say in where it went. They may have reached out to potential reviewers and may be awaiting a response. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. (date). After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. However, I submitted the paper at the end of May and the status is still “under review. 'Awaiting reviewer selection' MEANS. Click on “Take Action. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change Recently I have submitted my manuscript to one of the top international journals and 'awaiting reviewer selection' is I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. I have written to (name) on (date) and (date), but have not heard back from him/her. Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. Firstly, the status may not have changed for a month because either the Associate Editor (AE) or the peer reviewer(s) (or both) have not been available or are busy with other activities. What should I do?’. Can you tell me what sort of time frame to keep in mind as I am awaiting news of my submission? The difference between "reviewer invited" and "under review" is simply that in the second case, at least one invited reviewer has agreed to review it. Receiving the first decision I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. ” It has been almost 2 months now. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. journal some months before and the "with editor" process was just a week. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. As it has been only two weeks since you submitted your paper and only one week since the status changed to ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment,’ you may need to wait for some time, let’s say, two-three weeks, for the next status update. In this case 15 days is plenty of time to ask for a status update. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. During the process, a considerable amount of time might be needed. They tried on their own, failed, then asked you for help after two months (kind of a long time, but not a priori unreasonable). After 11 months, the referee evaluation was finalised. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. Since it has been about a month since the status “Awaiting a reviewer reply” has been put up, the second option seems more likely. The following guidance aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. The journal review process. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. It’s more common to have a challenge finding peer reviewers, unless with this journal or for this paper, the review is to be done internally. One reason why this stage is taking long could be that the journal editor is having a tough time finding suitable peer reviewers. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? So, we have made some edits/assumptions. Publication speed is very important to you as an author for obvious reasons: you must write to the editor if you have no news back about peer review and a reasonable amount of time has passed. Once you have done this, submit your article through the ScholarOne, RAE’s submission management system. @Coder: When it comes to IEEE or Elsevier, 15 days is not a long time at all (unless you are communicating with journals that come under Letters). Quoting this answer, Depending on the scope of submitted paper, editors sometimes have hard time to find a suitable reviewer. 2) Whatever electronic system is conveying to you the message "awaiting reviewer For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting . 4 The publishing time is too long, starting from 3 months. I won't be I had the same problem at two journals that led to the site showing awaiting editors decision or in process for a very long time. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. Whether a long time at this status hints towards a negative outcome. If I withdraw my submission now, I'll forfeit all the time I've already invested in waiting. The journal told me previously that this review process might take from 4-6 months. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. . Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. Why the editor is taking time to decide? View. The system still says ‘awaiting reviewer scores’. What Skip to main content I have submitted a manuscript to a pediatrics-related journal. Some do it in time, some start a day before the deadline, some need a number of reminders after the deadline, Status stuck at Awaiting Editor Assignment. Awaiting ME This means that your manuscript has not yet been assigned to a reviewer. Popular Articles. 5 months with no change in status. R: Before submitting an article, check the norms available in the RAE Guidelines, in the Author Section. Your reviewers will read your paper or case study and teaching note and provide the journal editor with detailed and useful comments. Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. I thought it may take 3 months or so for reviews to come in, but I am starting to get worried that it may potentially take longer than this. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Most quality journals take time to complete the peer review The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three How long should I wait, and what can be Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, stated: "We are I submitted a paper to some journal. Thank you, William, for your prompt reply. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. How long I should wait for the final verdict? What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted it and the reviews are either due or overdue. What constitutes a ‘reasonable amount of time’? Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Our SAP Certified Associate C_TS4CO_2021 practice exam questions are available at any time, anywhere, at your convenience, My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to Awaiting AE Decision". So your manuscript is one step closer to a final decision. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of reviewers (usually two or three) for the peer review. Hi, I have submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal. The people that you suggested somehow didn't pan out, and they reacted badly to that, putting your work on some sort of long-term queue. Now it is almost 3 weeks. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that consideration. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. 23 Status 5: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 11. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Indeed, we encourage authors to suggest reviewers, as set out in our advice to contributors. Unfortunately, I was timid and Reviewer List. Skip to My manuscript suddenly went from "Awaiting Final Decision" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Role of the reviewer. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. 21, awaiting AE decision. Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" The overall timeframe, 2 weeks from submission to decision, is at the long end of what we'd like for a reject without review (we try to turn papers around quickly), but it's not uncommon. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. A month is a long time for this situation, but it can happen. Peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript and therefore takes time. What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? Question. I submitted a paper to an internationally reputed journal. It has been 1. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". AE stands for "Associate Editor. Okay, it has been sent for review again. It means nothing. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. The AE is not solely employed by IEEE, but also has a faculty position (usually) and other obligations. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Editor here. I've got a paper going on 10 months that says "awaiting reviewer selection". I have previously published in the same journal So, waiting for a long time to hear from the Editor after reviews have been completed is quite The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer The average review period of the target journal that I submitted is two weeks, and it usually takes about a month to get the first revision. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. 1. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. If that is the case, The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. You could wait up to a month before thinking of sending a polite reminder. subject=status report of (paper)? // "I'm concerned about my (date) submission, which was confirmed on (date). – I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. The first update, ADM: [a person’s name], means that the manuscript was first in administrative (shortened to ‘ADM’) processing, which is the typical first stage after submission. In general, editors and journals may want more than you to have a quick decision back to you, as the journal indices can be affected, which in turn may affect authors selecting the journal, and, . However, today, A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. Reviewer assignments (i. Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that I received a mail about five hours after submission stating: It is a pleasure to inform you that your manuscript titled XYZ has passed initial screening and is now awaiting reviewer selection. Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take too long to give his recommendation. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. 6. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. Not necessarily. Sincerely, [Your name]. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the Status 3: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 11. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but If accepted, the paper is sent to production. The status of my submission changed from "Under Review" to "Ready for Decision" on November 8 and it has been constant since then. Just give it some time; either you will get a decision or it will go for the review process. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. Then, it’s quite fine to write to the editor seeking an update on the manuscript. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". Then I wholly revised my paper according to reviewers’ comments and re-submitted it. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. t backed up) The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. View. These status should not be taken seriously. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" and has been in this status Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the These are relatively simple. Does it mean the work will be My paper underwent a revision. "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. 23 Status 6: Awaiting AE Make Decision 12. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". I submitted a paper to a high-level journal (3rd) that uses the SholarOne system. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. manuscript at any time on the online peer review system. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? Upon receipt of Reviewer Scores, the AE would normally make a judgment, based on the comments from the reviewers, to either accept or reject, outrightly or conditionally. Four weeks is a long time for an Editor to sit on a decision. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. What does this mean? But, quickly after this, the status changed to “awaiting EIC decision” within 2 weeks and is stuck at that for 3 weeks. Just want to know what you think based on I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. Here are some suggestions for additional potential colleagues who would be in a position to provide suitable peer review. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. Awaiting Reviewer Scores Thank you for your question. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). This refers to the thanks a lot. Related Publications. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. What does this mean? Will it go for review? I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Does this indicate rejection? When the current Editors took over the journal in 2003, Thorax changed to online manuscript submission 2 and, for the first time, authors were formally invited to suggest up to four suitable peer reviewers for their work. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. Things have only become worse in the pandemic and post-pandemic periods. Although it's frustrating, your manuscript is probably one of many they are responsible for and they have their own stuff going on. When i have contacted the editorial office, they Ex. It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. 3 Status 7: Assigned to Editor 12. The bad sign stems from the fact that it really shouldn't take seven months to find a reviewer. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced During this time, the editor looks for Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? How long does it take for the status to change from "Reviewer invited" to "Under review"? Answered by Editage Insights on 07 Nov, 2019 . Among one month, the status stays "Awaiting Referee Reports" without handling by editor. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. Sorry! nothing found for. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week In October (or November, my bad, I don't remember exactly, I should've taken note) the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer score', and that's what the status says to this day. The manuscript awaiting the assignment of an editor for more than two-and-half months is both a bit long and unusual. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. My manuscript, which I sumbit to a journal of Sage in September 2022, passed the Editor stage and was taken for peer review. Is long period a good or bad sign? I do understand that you cannot have exact answer. Status 3: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 11. e. To check the status of your submission in o I submitted a paper to a science journal and 3 months later I got result which requires 'Major Revision'. What can this mean? The platform is Waiting time. I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. The acceptance for IEEE Signal Processing Letters did not take much time for me. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. The day after the submission though, the two statuses of ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Decision’ were displayed together. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for an existing reviewer in the system or to create a new reviewer account. However, I just noticed that the status of my I submitted a manuscript to a journal, and the status changed from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. If there is no update by then, you may consider writing to the editor about it. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Does it mean the paper has been sent for peer review or is it still eligible for desk rejection? Please advise. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. I think it seems a long time for this step. It might take a long time to find appropriate reviewers. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. However, I definitely remember the last two: “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. " Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews are completed and have been received by the editorial office. 22 Status 4: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. The contributor form will be Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. 6. If a paper is sent out for evaluation, we normally select 3 external reviewers including (if appropriate) one reviewer suggested by the authors. I have not had any news about it since. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. I have heard from my peers and other co-researchers and investigators, that the EIC decision should not be taking so long. Hot Network Questions Are plastic stems on TPU tubes supposed to be reliable 80-90s sci-fi movie in which scientists did something to make the world pitch A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. 6 answers. After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory Reviews completed --> self-explanatory With editor --> this may occur early in the review process, indicating the article is under desk review by relevant editor(s), who are deciding whether to send the paper to reviewers; but it may also occur after reviewer scores are received, indicating the editor is in the process Recently, I have submitted a mathematical paper to a journal published by Taylor & Francis. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Review and selection of manuscripts. nyqfc dwkrp easse kpjd cquvuhfq osteys vqph zxehu bblj bmhf