Pfsense vs mikrotik reddit. Need a router, prebuilt with low power draw, has SFP.
Pfsense vs mikrotik reddit 35 votes, 15 comments. If OP wants just a router, he can get any off the shelf TP-Link for 20$. You could combat those 3 by virtualizing your pfSense/OPNsense instance on a host that also does other stuff, but that comes with challenges of its own. I wasn't so lucky with finding answers for OPNSense. Pfsense is stable and the pfblockerng is great blocking system, but the layout of the ui is horrendous. I used that exclusively until pfSense release 25, and I got tired of constant breaking issues and horrible hardware experiences with Netgate branded hardware that I gave up and went to Mikrotik. I used to have pfSense running on esxi, but switched to pfSense on proxmox about 18 months ago, that ran great until I upgraded to a 500/70 fibre WAN connection and pfSense maxed out at about 350Mb/s. So. Need a router, prebuilt with low power draw, has SFP. I've found it to be incredible for my needs, and my boxes have been rock solid and trouble-free for quite some time now. 5+10Gb routers, which are tempting, but I don't really have the motivation to tinker with (learn) pfsense or opnsense or other custom stuff, and I found this Mikrotik router for €180 used. Hello, I'm a user of PFSense and OPNsense for about 8 years now (OPNsense since 2019). RouterOS is optimized for use with MikroTik's RouterBOARD hardware, though it is compatible with third-party hardware as well. MikroTik RouterOS is based around the Linux 2. I'm probably going to leave this setup and stick with PFsense probably. I have an extreme budget (under £80) I started with the pfSense software back when it was a 16Mb firewall distro called m0n0wall. 80 MB ( Version 2. I’ve mostly dabbled in OPNsense, but these projects all seem to basically do what they say on the tin. Mikrotik CHR will instantly loose it's license and revert 1-Meg throughput when you move it between ESXi hypervisors. From what I've read, they're basically the same except for OPNSense has a better UI, better Wireguard support, and more packages, so I was leaning towards going with OPNSense. PfSense is move friendly when migrating from one hypervisor to another ( copy you PfSense router from one ESXi server to another ). 6 kernel. I want to have a network with OpenVPN so I can remote control my server, and PiHole. 3 which gets EOL'd in 31/Mar/2023 Worst case they could bump it to 12. Is PFsense more powerful for my tasks, or should I just use my Mikrotik? OpenWrt for Mikrotik RB750gr3 vs. When you set it up and run into a roadblock, just reach out here and someone is sure to help! Made exactly the same switch recently. The documentation is definitely not nearly as good for OPNSense as for pfSense. My preference is pfSense over OPNsense if for no other reason than documentation alone (there’s an official pfSense book that’s like 600 pages, iirc, and it’s quite exhaustive). It’s basically just “here’s how you connect to the internet, make sure you don’t allow my IP addresses as source address from WAN, and oh please announce yourself as a default route via OSPFv3 so the other I'm setting up a home network with a Unifi AP and a firewall, and I was wondering whether I should use PFSense or OPNSense. Yeah, you're gonna want to research that a bit more friend. pfSense has some of the best documentation around. Pfsense advantage: The classic features such as content inspection, content protection, and the application-level firewall, are incorporated. I’ve used mikrotik and pfsense. in my company I threw out all the pfsense machines and replaced them with mikrotik, primarily because of the power consumption. 4 which will be EOL'd 31/Dec/2023 Anyway the point is somewhat moot because they already announced that they will be using FreeBSD-Current (v14. 7 Development ) - iso file Yea, OP can get Mikrotik, but feature wise and performance wise, Pfsense outperforms RouterOS. pfSense handles the internet, routing and firewalling etc. 3-epa1 has served me well for the past few weeks. 1. I thought it would be ok, but I didn't realize how dumbed down the stock firmware would be. 5 Gig rates , then Mikrotik CHR is faster. Dec 14, 2024 · Exploring MikroTik vs pfSense also reveals differences in customization and scalability. I found that Mikrotik added Cake for traffic shaping in the beta version of RouterOS. I switched to Sophos XG a year or two ago and it's been pretty good. Uh, a configuration issue will give you issues on ANY router or firewall. Mikrotik is a bit clunkier in the GUI than opnsense, but it being Linux-based makes it a bit easier understanding what's going on in the inside I feel like. I’m really happy with the result. PfSense is based on FreeBSD, a Unix-type operating system that is fully UNIX compliant and compatible. PFSense is easier to use though. I've been using both in harmony for years. Sep 13, 2024 · ps - I decided pfsense/opnsense over the mikrotik 5009 because I'm unfamiliar with winbox. 0 is based on 12. That unifi stuff costs too much $$ and looks like it locks you in a bit like Apple. Not as many people use OPNSense. 5Gb and 2. Digging through options (excluding options as PC engines or NUC-like alternatives) I found MikroTik and Ubiquiti providing similar functions hardware-wise: MikroTik hEX S. pfSense thrives on its open-source model, offering users access to an extensive library of plugins and extensions that cater to specific networking needs. I'm using pfSense plus OpenWRT; have for many years and has served me well. For home use I would recommend pfsense/opnsense as router (you get all that higher level stuff like IDS/IPS, ngblocker, big bonus ui is very intuitive, built in support for openvpn/wiregurad ) + some basic manageable switches tplink/netgear for L2. They are both good systems. The cheapest pfSense appliance Netgate sells that's actually able to push 1 Gbps is the SG4100, which starts at $600. If you want something fully integrated - definitely go MikroTik. RouterOs can do almost same,but you must have knowledge. I have used both Mikrotik and Pfsense. If you really want to see what PFSense is about, I think it would be better for you to set it up and use ir, rather than ask peoples opinions about it. pfSense comes with support for multiple VPNs (both client and server) for OpenVPN, Wireguard, IPSec, L2TP, GRE, GIF and Zerotier. Assuming you aren’t buying a netgate appliance for pfsense, having your router being an appliance can be pretty nice. Doesn't matter if its pfsense, opnsense, sonicwall, palo alto, mikrotik, unifi. ? After many years of using Tomato or Asus-Merlin firmware, I got a new TP-Link AX1500 router that doesn't support third party firmware. Both are very capable. Complemented my one VyOS router with another two physical routers (VyOS = Dedicated lab router, Mikrotik HAP AC = Dedicated home router, Mikrotik Hex S = Router @ Co-Lo). x) for all new releases. I have a computer just laying around, and I'm wondering if I should sell my Mikrotik and build a PFsense router instead. While researching I found some STH reviews on 2. Jan 1, 2022 · IMO , if you are going to be performing NAT444 at over 2. no thanks. yea, don't blame pfsense for that. Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X SFP. As frenchiepush said pfsense is a high grade firewall system and openwrt is suited to wifi ap and basic routing capabilities. I’m only using it at the edge though, so my VyOS configuration is pretty short. true. If you want cheap failover between two routers, you could go with virtualized pfsense. I found that the initial questions I had about pfSense had already been answered by the community. Nanopi R2S vs. Although it's a beast, seems like a lot to learn from scratch. That may or may not be a concern. I’ve run IPFire (and pfSense) for years without issue. It took a while for me to really figure it out, but there are guides out there that will help you get up to speed. With Opnsense there will always be a time when your router stops working after you/ve updated. But I have not had this problem with Mikrotik since the last 4 or so years. I had pfSense for a while, but I just wanted to do more with it and I'm not that comfortable with BSD so I switched to what I know best, Linux 😊 Would always pick something running on general purpose hardware as it is more flexible and can always be reused and upgraded. Planning on connecting it via SFP to an Ubiquiti US-48-750W switch to 40 or so connections (rooms, APs, Sonos, IP cameras and the rest). Keys for me are ease of use with deep extensibility where I need it. Although I am mikrotik fan, and we are on mikrotik subredit ( this i get likely downvoted ). I’m using it. I've used Mikrotik before and liked it a lot. 6. . This is a pointless debate tbh but I would still like a comparison on 'dedicated' firewalls vs PFsense on an old laptop. You can get three RB5009s for that if you can ever find them in stock anywhere. While I use PFSense and always recommend, I think you should continue to us IPFire. It was a case of upgrade the server hardware, buy a microPC to run pfSense directly or buy a physical router. If you select the wrong checkbox on ANY of them, you are going to have a bad day. But I feel the pfsense is getting left behind the feature set of Opnsense. tia Feb 1, 2022 · IMO , if you are going to be performing NAT444 at over 2. PfSense vs Router OS ( Mikrotik ) Why install media of Router OS is so small as compared with pfSense ? pfSense : 847. Just depends what you want. Any pros & cons for these two? Or even an alternative? (I know this is the mikrotik sub-reddit so there might be a bit of bias involved) I decided to rebuild my home network recently without consumer type equipment and gave a go to Mikrotik (RB5009Upr) and TP-Link Omada for the WiFi (multiple PoE wall plates). Mikrotik has a very steep learning curve compared to opnsense, but comparitively its very stable. It has a higher than average learning curve, but it is very rewarding, rock stable and highly performant. For the same price I could probably get pfSense appliance or RB5009. IMO, Alix boards that OP linked aren't really affordable because for 200$ OP can get x86 Atom or Celeron box that will be light years ahead of Mikrotik (and many others). OpenWRT powers most of my switches and all of my WiFi AP's. There was a learning curve with the Mikrotik router, but there are plenty of resources online to guide you through the concepts and pfSense 2.
vloyuz
zqze
whgo
opcbtpk
gaw
dsen
gfwp
fhnaapl
usgmrj
idf
nxtpm
llmmx
erlg
wpolsy
pqtav