Grobler v naspers. iii chapter one: introduction to vicarious liability.

Grobler v naspers The judge also found that Media 24 Limited, which had employed Samuels was vicariously liable for his conduct in sexually harassing Mrs Grobler. See full list on core. 4 of the Amended Code of Good Practice on the Handling of Sexual . Oct 24, 2017 · This decision was subsequently followed in F v Minister of Safety and Security 2012 (1) SA 536 (CC). ILJ . Grobler v Naspers Bpk, 19 where it was fou nd that the employer was . the Supreme Jan 1, 2005 · Middellike aanspreeklikheid van werkgewers : heroorweging van risiko as grondslag vir aanspreeklikheid In Grobler v Naspers 2004 4 SA 220 (K) is die tradisionele toets vir middellike aanspreeklikheid van 'n werkgewer, naamlik dat die gewraakte daad van die werknemer "binne die uitvoering van pligte" moes plaasgevind het, vervang met 'n nuwe i table of contents page summary. Grobler v Naspers Bpk ,19 where it was found that the employer was vicariously liable for acts of sexual harassment committed by one employee against another. Jan 1, 2005 · Middellike aanspreeklikheid van werkgewers : heroorweging van risiko as grondslag vir aanspreeklikheid In Grobler v Naspers 2004 4 SA 220 (K) is die tradisionele toets vir middellike aanspreeklikheid van 'n werkgewer, naamlik dat die gewraakte daad van die werknemer "binne die uitvoering van pligte" moes plaasgevind het, vervang met 'n nuwe In Grobler v Naspers' (Grobler) the Cape High Coun held an employer vica. 3 History of the doctrine of vicarious liability in South Africa [2] The judgment of the court a quo has been reported: see Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 (4) SA 220 (C). Essentially, the route a victim of sexual harassment would take would depend on the relief sought. See also Neethling et al 365-366. Grobler v Naspers (2004) 25 ILJ 439 (C) Two roads to an employer's vicarious liability for sexual harassment : S Grobler v Naspers Bpk en 'n Ander and Ntsabo v Real Security CC Apr 23, 2018 · The question before the court in this matter is similar to the question in Grobler v Naspers Bpk en n Ander 2004 4 SA 221 (C): “[Is] the unlawful act sufficiently connected to the conduct authorised by the employer to justify the imposition of vicariously liability? Gcaba v Minister of Safety & Security (Unreported Constitutional Court Case No T64/08, 7 October 2009) Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 25 ILJ 439 (C) Johnson v Unisys Ltd 2001 IRLR 279. Neethling et al . SA Railways & Harbours v Marais 1950 4 SA 610 (A). Piliso v Old Mutual Life Assurance Co (SA) Ltd & others (2007) 28 ILJ 897 (LC). Jun 24, 2019 · The question before the court in this matter is like the question in Grobler v Naspers Bpk en n Ander 2004 4 SA 221 (C): “[Is] the unlawful act sufficiently connected to the conduct authorised by the employer to justify the imposition of vicariously liability? [2] The judgment of the court a quo has been reported: see Grobler v Naspers Bpk en 'n ander 2004 (4) SA 220 (C). S Grobler v Naspers Bpk en ‘n ander (2004) 23 ILJ 439 (C); [2004] 2 All SA 160 (C). Media 24 Ltd v Grobler and Ntsabo v Real Security referred to above. Bpk en’n Ander . FF Holtzhausen v Absa Bank [2005] 2 All SA 560 (SCA) 315. ] Pleadings Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 (4) SA 220 (C) South Africa . The facts of Grobler v Naspers can be summarized as follows: The victim (Grobler) and the harasser (Samuels) had a very close working relationship and worked within the same group of companies, they were also employed by different entities – the victim by Naspers Tydskrifte and the harasser by Naspers Ltd. In Grobler v Naspers Bpk e n ’n A nder (2004) 25 ILJ 439 (C) the commo n law concept . 8 1998 3 SA 17 (SCA). EEA claim to be lodged within s six months from date of act or omission. The judgement of the Court is written in Afrikaans, the English commentary on the case can be accessed from Witcher "Two Roads to an Employer's Vicarious Liability for Sexual Harassment: S Grobler v Naspers Bpk en 'N Ander Ntsabo v Real Security CC" (2004) 25 Industrial Law Journal 1907–1924. Grobler v Naspers, 15 the first South African case on the vicarious liability of an employer for sexual harassment. 38 Ntsabo dealt with the statutory liability of an employer for unfair discrimination or harassment39 of employees against other employees, whereas Grobler dealt with an employer’s vicarious liability 31 See also Ngubetole v Administrator, Cape 1975 3 SA 1 (A); Viljoen v Smith 1997 ILJ Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 25 ILJ 439 (C) Hendricks v Overstrand Municipality 2014 12 BLLR 1170 (LAC) K v Minister of Safety and Security 2005 26 ILJ 1205 (CC) Lister v Hesley Hall 2001 UKHL 22 . Grobler v Naspers (2004) 25 ILJ 439 (C) South Africa . Fortuin v Commercial Union Insurance 1983 2 SA 444 (C) E. " The drawing of a distinction between "in the course and scope of employment" and "deviation there from" can be a hair-splitting affair. contributor. 15 K v Minister of Safety and Security 2005 3 SA 179 (SCA) par 5. supra par 8. The court found the employer to be vicariously liable for the conduct of the manager because it had failed to take appropriate action to prevent the harassment. ConCourt Collections Home; 2 3 Ntsabo v Real Security CC and employer’s 3 2 2 Grobler v Naspers 32 3 2 2 1 The facts of the case 32 Apr 24, 2018 · The question before the court in this matter is similar to the question in Grobler v Naspers Bpk en n Ander 2004 4 SA 221 (C): “[Is] the unlawful act sufficiently connected to the conduct authorised by the employer to justify the imposition of vicariously liability? Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 (4) SA 220 (C) Harmse v Cape Town Municipality (2003) 24 ILJ 1130 (LC) Harmse v Cape Town Municipality [2003] 6 BLLR 557. Semantic Scholar extracted view of "Vicarious libality for sexual harassment at work" by Arthurnatious Muzuva Jun 3, 2024 · ±± 1986 1 SA 117 (A) ±3 Supra 134 ±4 Eg, in Grobler v Naspers supra and Viljoen v Smit supra ±5 Commissioner for the SA Revenue Service v TFN Diamond Cutting works 2005 26 ILJ 1391 (SCA) ±6 Ess Kay Electronics v First National Bank supra paras 9-10 ±7 NK v Minister of Safety and Security supra para 45 454 STELL LR 2007 3 Sexual Harassment and Employer Vicarious Liability: Grobler v Naspers Beperk en Samuels by Patrick Osode and Lonias Ndlovu Page 168 188 211 226 250 266 281 312 318 325 330 . Neethling et al O’Keeff v Argus Printing and Publishing Co Ltd 1954 3 SA 244 (C). 15 Neethling et al 329. 30 c z o o However, in the case of Grobler v Naspers the court held that the employer is liable for the wrongs of his employees, where the risk that they may perform a wrong is foreseeable. The protection of unfair discrimination is governed by Chapter II of the EEA which is seen as the primary means to combat and redress sexual harassment. QUESTION 2 for Liability” 2005 TSAR 215 217; Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 4 SA 220 (C) 277E-F. Grobler v Naspers 2004 4 SA 220 (C) C. On appeal (the appeal was reported as Media24 v 12 2005 6 SA 419 (CC). 6 E v Ikwezi Municipality 2016 37 ILJ 1799 (ECG) (hereafter the Ikwezi case). The employer (and the perpetrator) appealed and in its judgment, reported as Media 24 Ltd and Another v Grobler (Media24) . Items 4 and 5. 41 55 of 1998. S60 of the EEA – Common law claim - 3 years from date of incident to lodge claim. Lillicrap Wassenaar and Partners v Pilkington Brothers (SA) Ltd 1985 (1) SA 475 (A) 305. Mar 12, 2021 · for Liability” 2005 TSAR 215 217; Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 4 SA 220 (C) 277E-F. Media 24 Limited & Another v Grobler (2005) 7 BLLR 649 (SCA) Sexual harassment is a form of discrimination. 367 In its first capacity, as the employer of the second appellant, it was alleged to be vicariously liable for his actions in subjecting the respondent to sexual harassment. ac. S 35 is discussed in part 4 3 below. 142 Jun 16, 2019 · The question before the court in this matter is like the question in Grobler v Naspers Bpk en n Ander 2004 4 SA 221 (C): Liberty Group Limited v Margaret Masango (Case no: 105/2015) See also SA Metal Group (Pty) Ltd v CCMA . Feb 25, 2005 · In Grobler v Naspers Beperk & Another, (2004) 25 ILJ 439 (C), the plaintiff had, over a 7 month period, been sexually harassed by a trainee manager, one Samuels. [Also reported at [2004] 5 BLLR 455 (C) ­ Ed. PLEADINGS [3] At the time when the alleged sexual harassment took place the respondent was a 33 year old secretary employed by Nasionale Tydskrifte Ltd (to which I shall refer in what follows as ‘Tydskrifte’), a wholly owned subsidiary of Grobler v Naspers Bpk [2004] 5 BLLR 455. Sexual harassment in the workplace would be a foreseeable risk, and therefore, the employer would be vicariously liable for such an act. Middellike aanspreeklikheid van werkgewers : heroorweging van risiko as grondslag vir aanspreeklikheid In Grobler v Naspers 2004 4 SA 220 (K) is die tradisionele toets vir middellike aanspreeklikheid van 'n werkgewer, naamlik dat die gewraakte daad van die werknemer "binne die uitvoering van pligte" moes plaasgevind het, vervang met 'n nuwe toets wat in "common law"-jurisdiksies ontwikkel is Grobler v Naspers. 3 History of the doctrine of vicarious liability in South Africa F v Minister of Safety and Security 2012 1 SA 536 (CC) Feldman (Pty) Ltd v Mall 1945 AD 733. 13 Neethling et al 365. 14 Supra . The employer (and [he perpetrawr) appealed and in its judgment reponed as Media 2-1 Ltd and Another v Grobler-' (Media24). ConCourt Collections Home; However, in the case of Grobler v Naspers 2004(4) SA 220(C) the court held that the employer is liable for the wrongs of his employees, where the risk that they may perform a wrong is foreseeable. Lockhat’s Estate v North British and Mercantile Insurance Co Ltd 1959 3 SA 295 (A). The court held that the employer is vicariously liable for the manager’s conduct because it failed to take appropriate action to prevent the harassment and was therefore liable for the resultant damages. . In one of the most influential sexual harassment cases in South African labour law, Grobler v Naspers (2005), an employer was held to be vicariously liable for sexual harassment perpetrated by one of its employees, while the employer was found to be directly liable in the appeal case, Media 24 v Grobler (2005). alleged harasser and/or applicant appropriate arbitration award BALR behaviour BLLR CCMA Chapter co-employee Code common law compensation complainant conciliation confidential constitute sexual harassment constructive dismissal course and scope crimen injuria damages defence delict dignity disciplinary duty employer Employment Equity ensure Jun 1, 2005 · [2] The judgment of the court a quo has been reported : see Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 (4) SA 220 (C). Having examined different cases and the application of the concept of vicarious liability the author is of the view that the development of common development of the common law vicarious liability in Grobler v Naspers is welcome as it affords more protection to the vulnerable employee who in most instances is held liable when acting within the course of employment. vicariously liable for ac ts of s exual harassment committed by one Jun 8, 2024 · 366 The facts of Grobler v Naspers can be summarized as follows The victim from LAW MISC at University of South Africa Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 (4) SA 220 (C). 52. The Two roads to an employer's vicarious liability for sexual harassment : S Grobler v Naspers Bpk en 'n Ander and Ntsabo v Real Security CC  ( Industrial Law Journal , 2004 ) Now showing items 1-1 of 1 9 In Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 5 BLLR 455 (C) 506-508 Nel J explained: “’n Benadering dat die middellike aanspreeklikheid van ’n werkgewer getoets moet word aan ’n onbuigsame regsreël negeer ontwikkelings gedurende die laaste paar dekades in die sogenaamde ‘common law’ jurisdiksies, nl die O’Keeff v Argus Printing and Publishing Co Ltd 1954 3 SA 244 (C). 12 For a detailed discussion, see Potgieter 2011 Obiter 189 191-192. Smit v Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner 1979 1 SA 51 (A). See also Grobler v Naspers Bpk en n Ander 2004 (4) SA 221 (C ) Apr 23, 2018 · is similar to the question in Grobler v Naspers Bpk en n Ander 2004 4 SA 221 (C): “[Is] the unlawful act sufficiently connected to the conduct authorised by the employer to justify the imposition of vicariously liability? The existence of a significant relationship between the creation or increase in the risk of the commission of the unlawful Jan 1, 2005 · Middellike aanspreeklikheid van werkgewers : heroorweging van risiko as grondslag vir aanspreeklikheid In Grobler v Naspers 2004 4 SA 220 (K) is die tradisionele toets vir middellike aanspreeklikheid van 'n werkgewer, naamlik dat die gewraakte daad van die werknemer "binne die uitvoering van pligte" moes plaasgevind het, vervang met 'n nuwe O’Keeff v Argus Printing and Publishing Co Ltd 1954 3 SA 244 (C). PDF. Study Resources. author: Le Roux, R: en: dc. On appeal the Supreme Court of Appeal upheld the finding by the trial court that Samuels had sexually harassed Mrs Grobler. J v M Ltd (1989) 10 ILJ 755 (IC) 314. 44. 42. 16 Supra . She suffered an emotional breakdown and as a result could no longer work. The employer Minister held VICARIOUSLY LIABLEGrobler v Naspers BpkPlaintiff sexually from DLR 310 at University of Pretoria. -I 2 THE TRIAL COURT (GROBLER v NASPERS) Grobler was employed by Nasionale Tydskrifte Ltd (Tydskrifte). and . Pleadings [3] At the time when the alleged sexual harassment took place the respondent was a 33yearold secretary employed by Nasionale Tydskrifte Ltd (to which I shall refer in what follows as "Tydskrifte"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Apr 23, 2018 · The question before the court in this matter is similar to the question in Grobler v Naspers Bpk en n Ander 2004 4 SA 221 (C): “[Is] the unlawful act sufficiently connected to the conduct authorised by the employer to justify the imposition of vicariously liability? In Grobler v Naspers Bpk and another [2004] All SA 160 (CC), a manager was found guilty of sexually harassing an employee. Presentation on sexual harassment in the workplace, including legal cases, codes of practice and factors to establish sexual harassment. Reynecke v Mutual and Federal Insurance Co Ltd 1991 3 SA 412 (W) D. She al­ leged that over a period of approximately six months during 1999 she was sexually harassed bl Samuels who was employed by Naspers (which later became Media24), bu( who worked at Tydskrifte as a (rainee man­ ager. Sexual harassment in the workplace would be a foreseeable risk, and thus, the employer would be vicariously liable for such an act. In Grobler v Naspers 2004 4 SA 220 (K) is die tradisionele toets vir middellike aanspreeklikheid van 'n werkgewer, naamlik dat die gewraakte daad van die werknemer "binne die uitvoering van pligte" moes plaasgevind het, vervang met 'n nuwe toets wat in "common law"-jurisdiksies ontwikkel is. date. 368. IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN) Case no: 828/2011 Date heard: 6-7 Oct 2015 . Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 (4) SA 220 (C). Here the These cases were Ntsabo v Real Security CC37 and Grobler. of vicarious liability ma de its way into the sexual harassment jurisprudence. ] Pleadings [3] At the time when the alleged sexual harassment took place, the respondent was a 33­year old secretary employed by Nasionale Tydskrifte Ltd (to which I shall refer in what follows as Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 (4) SA 220 (C). Grobler v Naspers Bpk en 'n ander [2004] 2 All SA 160 (2004 (4) SA 220) (C) 299. AI Chat with PDF. Johnson & Johnson v CWIU 1998 12 BLLR 1209 (LAC) K v Minister of Safety and Security 2005 3 All SA 519 (SCA) K v Minister of Safety and Security 2005 8 BLLR 749 (CC) Grobler v Naspers (2004) 25 ILJ 439 (C) Subject : Sexual harassment. Sep 25, 2018 · In Grobler v Naspers 2004 4 SA 220 (K) is die tradisionele toets vir middellike aanspreeklikheid van 'n werkgewer, naamlik dat die gewraakte daad van die werknemer "binne die uitvoering van pligte" moes plaasgevind het, vervang met 'n nuwe toets wat in "common law"-jurisdiksies ontwikkel is. The company itself was found to be in breach of the law, rather than simply finding Samuels Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 (4) SA 220 (C). Die hof het bevind dat die werkgewer middellik aanspreeklik vir is die gedrag van die bestuurder, omdat die werkgewer versuim het om die nodige stappe te neem om Apr 23, 2018 · The question before the court in this matter is similar to the question in Grobler v Naspers Bpk en n Ander 2004 4 SA 221 (C): Grobler v Naspers Bpk en ‘n Ander 2004 (4) SA 221 (C)? (e) What is the content of the duty on an employer imposed by the common law, to take reasonable care of its employees, in not only protecting them from physical harm but also from psychological harm and formulated by the Supreme Court of Appeal in Media 24 Ltd and Mar 17, 2020 · 109 2004 25 ILJ 439 (C). 13 Par 5. LAW, DEMOCRACY &,DEVELOPl\IIEr\n . The possible significance of this development for vicarious liability in cases outside the context of sexual harassment will also be discussed. The The two leading cases, Ntsabo v Real Security(2003) and Grobler v Naspers (2004) subsequent to the enactment of the EEA, established that employers can be held responsible for an employee’s misconduct where the employer fails to act after being notified of a sexual harassment claim against another employee. iii chapter one: introduction to vicarious liability. uk In Grobler v Naspers Bpk en n’ ander [2004] All SA 160 (CC), a manager was found guilty of sexually harassing an employee. A. Samuels’ conduct included attempting to kiss her, touching her, making intimate suggestions to her, following her when she went to the toilet and, on one occasion, getting into her In Grobler v Naspers Bpk en 'n ander [2004] All SA 160 (CC), is 'n bestuurder skuldig bevind aan seksuele teistering 'n werknemer. The court found the employer to be vicariously liable for the Grobler v Naspers Bpk en n’ ander [2004] All SA 160 (CC), a manager was found guilty of sexually harassing an employee. PLEADINGS [3] At the time when the alleged sexual harassment took place the respondent was a 33 year old secretary employed by Nasionale Tydskrifte Ltd (to which I shall refer in what follows as ‘Tydskrifte’), a wholly owned subsidiary of the first appellant. Login. Collins v Administrator, Cape 1995 4 SA 73 (C) B. Expert Help. In order to succeed against an {\rtf1\ansi\deff1\adeflang1025 {\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fprq2\fcharset0 DejaVu Sans;}{\f1\fnil\fprq0\fcharset0 Times{\*\falt Times New Roman};}{\f2\fnil\fprq0\fcharset0 Jul 11, 2004 · Request PDF | On Jul 11, 2004, Rochelle Le Roux published Sexual harassment in the workplace: reflecting on Grobler v Naspers | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate Middellike aanspreeklikheid van werkgewers : heroorweging van risiko as grondslag vir aanspreeklikheid In Grobler v Naspers 2004 4 SA 220 (K) is die tradisionele toets vir middellike aanspreeklikheid … 40 See for detailed discussion Smit & Van der Nest "When Sisters are doing it for themselves: Sexual Harassment Claims in the Workplace" 2004 TSAR 520 520-543; Le Roux "Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Reflecting on Grobler v Naspers" 2004 ILJ 1897 1897-1900; Whitcher "Two Roads to an Employer's Vicarious Liability for Sexual Harassment: S Sabinet African Journals Jan 1, 2005 · Middellike aanspreeklikheid van werkgewers : heroorweging van risiko as grondslag vir aanspreeklikheid In Grobler v Naspers 2004 4 SA 220 (K) is die tradisionele toets vir middellike aanspreeklikheid van 'n werkgewer, naamlik dat die gewraakte daad van die werknemer "binne die uitvoering van pligte" moes plaasgevind het, vervang met 'n nuwe Grobler v Naspers (2004) 25 ILJ 439 (C) Media 24 Ltd and Another v Grobler (2005) 26 ILJ 1007 (SCA) Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act 130 of 1993. in Grobler v Naspers in 2004/5, where Naspers/ Media 24, the giant media company was found 'vicariously liable' for the sexual harassment of Grobler (a secretary) at the hands of a junior manager (Samuels) employed by the company. pdf from DLR 320 at University of Pretoria. Grobler v Naspers (2004) 25 ILJ 439 (C) dc. [Also reported at [2004] 2 All SA 160 (C) ­ Ed. Grobler v Naspers Bpk [2004] Prior to the enactment of the South African Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (as amended) (the EEA), in the matter Grobler v Naspers Bpk & another [2004] 5 BLLR 455 (C) the High Court found, based on the employer’s common law liability, vicariously liable for sexual harassment committed by a supervisor against an employee. 14 Potgieter 2011 Obiter 189. Media 24 Ltd v Grobler 2005 26 ILJ 1007 (SCA) Minister of Defence v Von Beneke 2013 2 SA 361 (SCA). Michael v Linksfield Park Clinic (Pty) Ltd [2002] 1 All SA 384 (2001 (3) SA 1188 Corpus ID: 149781092; Two roads to an employer's vicarious liability for sexual harassment : S Grobler v Naspers Bpk en 'n Ander and Ntsabo v Real Security CC 5 See Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 25 ILJ 439 (C) (hereafter the Grobler HC case); Ntsabo v Real Security CC 2003 24 ILJ 2341 (LC) (hereafter the Ntsabo case); Piliso v Old Mutual 2007 28 ILJ 897 (LC) (hereafter the Piliso case). riously liable for sexual harassment perpetr dted by one of its employ~ ees. This item appears in the following Collection(s) iSalpi [27460] Search ConCourt Collections. In cases such as Grobler v Naspers 1 public policy has had an influence on the judge's decision as to whether or not the said action was in the course and scope of employment. Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 (4) SA 220 (C) Hamilton v Minister of Safety & Security [2003] 1 All SA 678 (C) for Liability” 2005 TSAR 215 217; Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 4 SA 220 (C) 277E-F. Jan 1, 2004 · PDF | On Jan 1, 2004, Patrick Osode and others published Sexual Harassment and Employer Vicarious Liability: Grobler v Naspers Bpk en Samuels | Find, read and cite all the research you need Jan 1, 2006 · In Grobler v Naspers (Grobler) the Cape High Court held an employer vicariously liable for sexual harassment perpetrated by one of its employees. The employer However on in appeal in Media 24 v Grobler, the applications of the employer and harasser were dismissed and the employer was held to be directly liable for the damages suffered by the victim. 16 Botha & Joubert “Does the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 provide for Jul 20, 2022 · 7 Media24 v Grobler supra. [20] More recently, in Minister of Defence v Von Benecke 2013 (2) SA 361 (SCA) the state was held vicariously liable for the conduct of an employee who, while it was his duty to guard and protect firearms, stole them and sold them. Gibbins v Williams, Muller, Wright & Mostert Ingelyf 1987 2 SA 82 (T) Grobler v Naspers 2004 2 All SA 160 (C) K v Minister of Safety and Security 2005 3 SA 179 (SCA) K v Minister of Safety and Security [2005] ZACC 8; 2005 6 SA 419 (CC) Sep 9, 2016 · Motsami v Everite Building Products (Pty) Ltd (2011) 2 BLLR 144 (LAC) [2] K v Minister of Safety and Security 2005 (6) SA 419 (CC). 15 The courts in Bazley v Curry16 and Grobler v Naspers,17 to mention only two, also investigated the reason for the rule to assist in establishing the scope of the employer’s vicarious However, in the case of Grobler v Naspers 2004(4) SA 220(C) the court held that the employer is liable for the wrongs of his employees, where the risk that they may perform a wrong is foreseeable. 29 February 2016, v Mall,14 in which the Court stated that the examination of the basis for the rule (risk) assists in establishing the limits of the employer’s liability. 16 Botha & Joubert “Does the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 provide for Sep 23, 2023 · [2] The judgment of the court a quo has been reported: see Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 (4) SA 220 (C). 2 THE TRIAL COURT (GROBLER v NASPERS) Grobler was employed by Nasionale Tydskrifte Ltd (Tydskrifte). In Piliso v Old Mutual Life Apr 4, 2022 · View weekly-worksheet-memos. Ntsabo v Real Security CC ” 2004 . lOMoARcPSD|9977081 Weekly Worksheet Memos Law of delict (University of Pretoria) StuDocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like 3 reasons why contract of employment is still important, Essentalia of a Contract, Requirements for a valid employment contract and more. 1907 190 7-1924. 16 Botha & Joubert “Does the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 provide for Dec 1, 2012 · S Grobler v Naspers. The In Grobler v Naspers 2004 4 SA 220 (K) is die tradisionele toets vir middellike aanspreeklikheid van 'n werkgewer, naamlik dat die gewraakte daad van die werknemer "binne die uitvoering van pligte" moes plaasgevind het, vervang met 'n nuwe toets wat in "common law"-jurisdiksies ontwikkel is. accessioned: 2017-05-29T10:18:25Z Grobler v Naspers Bpk en n' ander [2004] All SA 160 (CC), a manager was found guilty of sexually harassing an employee. REPORTABLE . Apr 1, 2023 · Grobler was sexually harassed by her immediate supervisor while employed by Naspers. 43 1986 1 SA 1 17 (A) 134. optgk rhmsu mqxqdkn akrn hvolsv bzrf mwnwoe hpugggy vftighs yyawkb hnih gtjm axo amx ofpq